淘优惠

淘优惠

OpenAI的创始人奥特曼:我相信光

热门文章 0

2023年11月20日 每日一猜答案: 答案:ABC
每日一猜答案分析:

奥特曼的开发者是谁,奥特曼创始者是谁,奥特曼的创始人长什么样,奥特曼创始人图片
近日微软向OpenAI投资数十亿美元,新一轮投资让其估值达到290亿美元。似乎又回到了上一次AI给人们带来无限想象的时候。OpenAI的创始人山姆・奥特曼(Sam Altman),则成为了这次AI新浪潮绝对的代言人。“没有任何附加条件,每个月给你一笔够你生活的钱。”如果我这样告诉你,你会不会觉得我在骗人。然而这是 YC 推出的一个叫做“基本收入”(Basic Income)的真实研究项目。这个项目会在美国的两个州随机找到 1000 人,每个人每月发 1000 美金,持续 3 年。如果财务不自由,我们可能没有辞职的勇气,也没办法去深入学习想学的技能。在奥特曼看来,这会让人进入次优状态,成为工资的奴隶,造成金钱和潜力的巨大错配。另外,他认为当人工智能替代了大量的岗位,劳动力成本降为零,美好生活的成本是会大幅下降的。“如果我们让核聚变发挥作用,电力是免费的,那么交通运输成本就会大幅下降。如果2016年一个美国四口之家需要七万美元才能幸福,那么在20年后它只需要3.5 万美元。”这会鼓励懒惰吗?奥特曼认为,有些人会无所事事,但很多人会努力地为整个社会创造更多的价值,我们都会变得更好。“基本收入”是 YC 研究院推出的第一个研目。YC 研究院是奥特曼在 2015 年推出的,现在已经独立出来成为一个非盈利性组织,并在 2020 年改名为OpenResearch。YC 一直以来都在通过投资创业公司来鼓励创新。但有些创新没法通过这种方式实现。例如,需要长时间研究的,研究问题的答案是开放式的,或者不应该由单个公司拥有的技术。“如果其中一些项目需要 25 年,我们完全可以接受。”

open ai 算法 open ai的技术是共享的么


Text received: 4 (0.16 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.19 seconds after request) Text received: 5 (0.21 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.24 seconds after request) Text received: 6 (0.27 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.29 seconds after request) Text received: 7 (0.32 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.35 seconds after request) Text received: 8 (0.37 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.40 seconds after request) Text received: 9 (0.43 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.46 seconds after request) Text received: 10 (0.48 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.51 seconds after request) Text received: 11 (0.54 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.56 seconds after request) Text received: 12 (0.59 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.62 seconds after request) Text received: 13 (0.64 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.67 seconds after request) Text received: 14 (0.70 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.72 seconds after request) Text received: 15 (0.75 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.78 seconds after request) Text received: 16 (0.84 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.84 seconds after request) Text received: 17 (0.86 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.89 seconds after request) Text received: 18 (0.91 seconds after request) Text received: , (0.94 seconds after request) Text received: 19 (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: 20 (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: 21 (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: 22 (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: 23 (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.41 seconds after request) Text received: 24 (1.46 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.46 seconds after request) Text received: 25 (1.46 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.55 seconds after request) Text received: 26 (1.61 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.65 seconds after request) Text received: 27 (1.66 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.70 seconds after request) Text received: 28 (1.72 seconds after request) Text received: , (1.75 seconds after request) Text received: 29 (1.78 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.05 seconds after request) Text received: 30 (2.08 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.13 seconds after request) Text received: 31 (2.16 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.20 seconds after request) Text received: 32 (2.26 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.28 seconds after request) Text received: 33 (2.31 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.35 seconds after request) Text received: 34 (2.38 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.54 seconds after request) Text received: 35 (2.55 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.59 seconds after request) Text received: 36 (2.61 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.64 seconds after request) Text received: 37 (2.67 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.71 seconds after request) Text received: 38 (2.86 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.89 seconds after request) Text received: 39 (2.92 seconds after request) Text received: , (2.95 seconds after request) Text received: 40 (2.99 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.01 seconds after request) Text received: 41 (3.04 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.08 seconds after request) Text received: 42 (3.15 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.33 seconds after request) Text received: 43 (3.36 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.43 seconds after request) Text received: 44 (3.47 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.50 seconds after request) Text received: 45 (3.53 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.56 seconds after request) Text received: 46 (3.59 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.63 seconds after request) Text received: 47 (3.65 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.68 seconds after request) Text received: 48 (3.71 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.77 seconds after request) Text received: 49 (3.77 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.79 seconds after request) Text received: 50 (3.82 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.85 seconds after request) Text received: 51 (3.89 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.91 seconds after request) Text received: 52 (3.93 seconds after request) Text received: , (3.96 seconds after request) Text received: 53 (3.98 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.04 seconds after request) Text received: 54 (4.05 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.07 seconds after request) Text received: 55 (4.10 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.13 seconds after request) Text received: 56 (4.19 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.20 seconds after request) Text received: 57 (4.20 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.23 seconds after request) Text received: 58 (4.26 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.30 seconds after request) Text received: 59 (4.31 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.59 seconds after request) Text received: 60 (4.61 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.64 seconds after request) Text received: 61 (4.67 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.72 seconds after request) Text received: 62 (4.73 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.76 seconds after request) Text received: 63 (4.80 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.83 seconds after request) Text received: 64 (4.86 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.89 seconds after request) Text received: 65 (4.92 seconds after request) Text received: , (4.94 seconds after request) Text received: 66 (4.97 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.00 seconds after request) Text received: 67 (5.03 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.06 seconds after request) Text received: 68 (5.09 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.14 seconds after request) Text received: 69 (5.16 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.19 seconds after request) Text received: 70 (5.22 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.28 seconds after request) Text received: 71 (5.30 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.33 seconds after request) Text received: 72 (5.36 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.38 seconds after request) Text received: 73 (5.41 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.44 seconds after request) Text received: 74 (5.48 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.51 seconds after request) Text received: 75 (5.53 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.56 seconds after request) Text received: 76 (5.60 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.62 seconds after request) Text received: 77 (5.65 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.68 seconds after request) Text received: 78 (5.71 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.77 seconds after request) Text received: 79 (5.77 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.79 seconds after request) Text received: 80 (5.82 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.85 seconds after request) Text received: 81 (5.88 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.92 seconds after request) Text received: 82 (5.93 seconds after request) Text received: , (5.97 seconds after request) Text received: 83 (5.98 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.01 seconds after request) Text received: 84 (6.04 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.07 seconds after request) Text received: 85 (6.09 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.11 seconds after request) Text received: 86 (6.14 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.17 seconds after request) Text received: 87 (6.19 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.22 seconds after request) Text received: 88 (6.24 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.27 seconds after request) Text received: 89 (6.30 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.31 seconds after request) Text received: 90 (6.35 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.36 seconds after request) Text received: 91 (6.40 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.44 seconds after request) Text received: 92 (6.46 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.49 seconds after request) Text received: 93 (6.51 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.54 seconds after request) Text received: 94 (6.56 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.59 seconds after request) Text received: 95 (6.62 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.64 seconds after request) Text received: 96 (6.68 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.68 seconds after request) Text received: 97 (6.70 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.73 seconds after request) Text received: 98 (6.75 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.78 seconds after request) Text received: 99 (6.90 seconds after request) Text received: , (6.92 seconds after request) Text received: 100 (7.25 seconds after request) Full response received 7.25 seconds after request Full text received: 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100

OpenAI花了1100万美元购买了ai.com

openai花了多少钱
打造ChatGPT的OpenAI团队有多少人?答案是371人。这甚至比很多国内大厂一个小部门人都要少。在今天的很多领域,特别是技术领域,一个牛X的人创造价值可能超过1000个人创造的。这也是为什么在这个领域有那么多名不见经传的创业公司能忽然崛起的原因。Instagram被Facebook10亿美元收购的时候仅仅只有13人,而WhatsApp被收购的时候团队也只有58人。“人多力量大”在科技领域完全不成立。“人多力量大”这个观点通常是指在人力资源领域,拥有越多的人就能够完成更多的工作或者解决更为复杂的问题。但是在科技领域,这个观点并不总是成立,因为在科技领域中,技术、创新和效率等因素比纯粹的人力资源更为重要。在很多时候,今天的科技大厂之所以规模比较大其实是要在多个业务上同时探索和试错,可以认为是不愿意错过下一个机会主动制造的冗余。